Screener
PBW vs IXC
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs iShares Global Energy ETF
Key differences
- IXC costs 0.24% less per year.
- IXC is significantly larger than PBW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IXC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBW | IXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $447M | $2.8B |
| Since | 2005 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.71% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +150.5% | +53.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.2% | +19.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -8.6% | +20.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.29% | 18.44% |
| Max drawdown | -89.06% | -64.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBW and IXC
Explore further