Screener
PBW vs KLMN
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF
Key differences
- KLMN costs 0.55% less per year.
- KLMN is significantly larger than PBW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PBW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBW | KLMN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $447M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2005 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.71% | 1.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +150.5% | +29.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -8.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.29% | 12.32% |
| Max drawdown | -89.06% | -18.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBW and KLMN
Explore further