Screener
PBW vs PIO
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco Global Water ETF
Key differences
- PBW costs 0.11% less per year.
- PBW covers north america markets; PIO covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, PBW has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBW | PIO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $447M | $281M |
| Since | 2005 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.71% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +159.6% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.9% | +8.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -8.4% | +3.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.35 | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.43% | 14.70% |
| Max drawdown | -89.06% | -35.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBW and PIO
Explore further