Screener
PBW vs CGW
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF
Key differences
- CGW costs 0.06% less per year.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBW | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $447M | $1.0B |
| Since | 2005 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.71% | 1.53% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +159.6% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.9% | +10.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -8.4% | +5.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.35 | 0.49 |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.43% | 13.38% |
| Max drawdown | -89.06% | -35.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBW and CGW
Explore further