Screener
PBW vs QQQM
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Key differences
- QQQM costs 0.49% less per year.
- QQQM is significantly larger than PBW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, QQQM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PBW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBW | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $447M | $82.9B |
| Since | 2005 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.71% | 0.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +150.5% | +40.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.2% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -8.6% | +18.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.29% | 16.01% |
| Max drawdown | -89.06% | -35.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBW and QQQM
Explore further