Screener
PBW vs QBIG
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco Top QQQ ETF
Key differences
- QBIG costs 0.35% less per year.
- PBW is significantly larger than QBIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PBW follows a index tracking strategy; QBIG uses active selection.
- PBW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBW | QBIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $447M | $36M |
| Since | 2005 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.71% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +150.5% | +41.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -8.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.29% | 19.60% |
| Max drawdown | -89.06% | -30.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBW and QBIG
Explore further