Screener
PFF vs CSHP
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF vs iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- CSHP costs 0.25% less per year.
- PFF is significantly larger than CSHP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PFF covers north america markets; CSHP covers global.
- PFF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFF | CSHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.9B | $190M |
| Since | 2007 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 5.65% | 5.10% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.4% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.79% | 0.33% |
| Max drawdown | -34.10% | -0.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFF and CSHP
Explore further