Screener
PFF vs MEAR
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF vs iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- MEAR costs 0.19% less per year.
- PFF is significantly larger than MEAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PFF follows a index tracking strategy; MEAR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PFF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PFF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFF | MEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.9B | $1.3B |
| Since | 2007 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 5.65% | 2.87% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.4% | +3.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.0% | +3.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.9% | +2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 0.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.79% | 0.86% |
| Max drawdown | -34.10% | -2.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFF and MEAR
Explore further