Screener
PFF vs NEAR
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF vs iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- NEAR costs 0.20% less per year.
- PFF is significantly larger than NEAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PFF follows a index tracking strategy; NEAR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PFF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PFF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFF | NEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.9B | $4.3B |
| Since | 2007 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 5.65% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.4% | +4.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.0% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.9% | +3.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.79% | 1.37% |
| Max drawdown | -34.10% | -9.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFF and NEAR
Explore further