Screener
PFFR vs VRIG
InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
Key differences
- VRIG costs 0.15% less per year.
- VRIG is significantly larger than PFFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PFFR follows a index tracking strategy; VRIG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PFFR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFFR | VRIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $118M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2017 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 8.16% | 4.86% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.8% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.5% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.5% | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | 2.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.00% | 0.50% |
| Max drawdown | -53.02% | -13.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFFR and VRIG
Explore further