Screener
VRIG vs PGF
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF vs Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
Key differences
- VRIG costs 0.25% less per year.
- VRIG is classified as fixed income, while PGF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- VRIG follows a active selection strategy; PGF uses index tracking.
- PGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VRIG | PGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $719M |
| Since | 2016 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 4.86% | 6.24% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.1% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.1% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.4% | -0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.90 | 0.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.50% | 6.36% |
| Max drawdown | -13.04% | -28.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VRIG and PGF
Explore further