Screener
VRIG vs IIGD
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF vs Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF
Key differences
- IIGD costs 0.17% less per year.
- VRIG is significantly larger than IIGD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VRIG follows a active selection strategy; IIGD uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, VRIG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| VRIG | IIGD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.13% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $31M |
| Since | 2016 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 4.86% | 4.27% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.1% | +4.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.1% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.4% | +1.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.90 | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.50% | 2.33% |
| Max drawdown | -13.04% | -11.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VRIG and IIGD
Explore further