Screener
PFM vs RPG
Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- RPG costs 0.17% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, RPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFM | RPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.52% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $764M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2005 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.37% | 0.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +39.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.2% | +26.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.8% | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.62% | 19.79% |
| Max drawdown | -32.21% | -36.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFM and RPG
Explore further