Screener
PFXF vs VRIG
VanEck Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
Key differences
- VRIG costs 0.10% less per year.
- PFXF follows a index tracking strategy; VRIG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PFXF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFXF | VRIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $1.5B |
| Since | 2012 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 6.31% | 4.86% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.2% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.5% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.4% | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | 2.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.86% | 0.50% |
| Max drawdown | -35.49% | -13.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFXF and VRIG
Explore further