Screener
PGF vs EPRF
Invesco Financial Preferred ETF vs Innovator S&P Investment Grade Preferred ETF
Key differences
- EPRF costs 0.08% less per year.
- PGF is significantly larger than EPRF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PGF is classified as equity, while EPRF is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- PGF follows a index tracking strategy; EPRF uses structured outcome.
- Over the last 3 years, PGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PGF | EPRF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $719M | $72M |
| Since | 2006 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 6.24% | 6.08% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.0% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.6% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.4% | -1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.25 | 0.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.36% | 7.59% |
| Max drawdown | -28.92% | -26.82% |
Similar to PGF and EPRF
Explore further