Screener
PGHY vs GTO
Invesco Global ex-US High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco Total Return Bond ETF
Key differences
- GTO is significantly larger than PGHY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PGHY follows a index tracking strategy; GTO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PGHY has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PGHY | GTO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $212M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2013 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 7.09% | 4.75% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.2% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.3% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.4% | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | 0.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.95% | 3.47% |
| Max drawdown | -20.50% | -20.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PGHY and GTO
Explore further