Screener
PGRI vs IWB
Putnam International Stock ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
- PGRI is classified as fixed income, while IWB is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- PGRI covers emerging markets markets; IWB covers north america.
Side-by-side comparison
| PGRI | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $46.2B |
| Since | — | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.96% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.07% |
| Max drawdown | -12.87% | -34.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PGRI and IWB
Explore further