Screener
PGRI vs SMMD
Putnam International Stock ETF vs iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Key differences
- PGRI is classified as fixed income, while SMMD is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- PGRI covers emerging markets markets; SMMD covers north america.
Side-by-side comparison
| PGRI | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $3.0B |
| Since | — | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.10% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +36.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.24% |
| Max drawdown | -12.87% | -41.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PGRI and SMMD
Explore further