Screener
PGRI vs IWM
Putnam International Stock ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- PGRI is classified as fixed income, while IWM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- PGRI covers emerging markets markets; IWM covers north america.
Side-by-side comparison
| PGRI | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $76.9B |
| Since | — | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.91% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 19.22% |
| Max drawdown | -12.87% | -41.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PGRI and IWM
Explore further