Screener
PGRI vs PEMX
Putnam International Stock ETF vs Putnam Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- PGRI is classified as fixed income, while PEMX is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- PGRI follows a index tracking strategy; PEMX uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| PGRI | PEMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $20M |
| Since | — | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.22% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +62.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 21.02% |
| Max drawdown | -12.87% | -14.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PGRI and PEMX
Explore further