Screener
PGX vs RWL
Invesco Preferred ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
Key differences
- RWL costs 0.11% less per year.
- PGX is classified as fixed income, while RWL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, RWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PGX | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.9B | $8.8B |
| Since | 2008 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 6.16% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.3% | +29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.1% | +20.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.3% | +13.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.31 | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.14% | 10.12% |
| Max drawdown | -34.10% | -36.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PGX and RWL
Explore further