Screener
PGX vs VRIG
Invesco Preferred ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
Key differences
- VRIG costs 0.20% less per year.
- PGX follows a index tracking strategy; VRIG uses active selection.
- PGX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PGX | VRIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.9B | $1.5B |
| Since | 2008 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 6.16% | 4.86% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.2% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.8% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.4% | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.28 | 2.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.15% | 0.50% |
| Max drawdown | -34.10% | -13.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PGX and VRIG
Explore further