Screener
PHO vs IFRA
Invesco Water Resources ETF vs iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IFRA costs 0.29% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, IFRA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PHO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PHO | IFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $4.1B |
| Since | 2005 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 1.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -1.6% | +33.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.9% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +13.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.23% | 14.82% |
| Max drawdown | -34.92% | -41.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PHO and IFRA
Explore further