Screener
PICB vs GTO
Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco Total Return Bond ETF
Key differences
- GTO costs 0.15% less per year.
- GTO is significantly larger than PICB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PICB follows a index tracking strategy; GTO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PICB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PICB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PICB | GTO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $360M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2010 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 3.29% | 4.75% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.5% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.9% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.1% | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.30 | 0.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.88% | 3.47% |
| Max drawdown | -37.15% | -20.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PICB and GTO
Explore further