Screener
PID vs MTRA
Invesco International Dividend Achievers ETF vs Invesco International Growth Focus ETF
Key differences
- PID is significantly larger than MTRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PID follows a index tracking strategy; MTRA uses active selection.
- PID has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PID | MTRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.53% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $929M | $142M |
| Since | 2005 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.28% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.71% | — |
| Max drawdown | -46.07% | -15.77% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PID and MTRA
Explore further