Screener
PKB vs KAUG
Invesco Building & Construction ETF vs Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - August
Key differences
- PKB costs 0.22% less per year.
- PKB is significantly larger than KAUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PKB is classified as equity, while KAUG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- PKB follows a index tracking strategy; KAUG uses structured outcome.
- PKB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PKB | KAUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $455M | $80M |
| Since | 2005 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.2% | +17.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.16% | 8.09% |
| Max drawdown | -52.30% | -15.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PKB and KAUG
Explore further