Screener
PKB vs RWL
Invesco Building & Construction ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
Key differences
- RWL costs 0.18% less per year.
- RWL is significantly larger than PKB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PKB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PKB | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $455M | $8.8B |
| Since | 2005 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.2% | +29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.3% | +20.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.1% | +13.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.16% | 10.12% |
| Max drawdown | -52.30% | -36.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PKB and RWL
Explore further