Screener
PLGI vs EPRF
PL Growth and Income ETF vs Innovator S&P Investment Grade Preferred ETF
Key differences
- EPRF costs 0.78% less per year.
- PLGI is classified as equity, while EPRF is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- PLGI follows a active selection strategy; EPRF uses structured outcome.
- EPRF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PLGI | EPRF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.25% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $61M | $72M |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 6.08% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +4.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 7.59% |
| Max drawdown | -7.26% | -26.82% |
Similar to PLGI and EPRF
Explore further