Screener
EPRF vs PFIG
Innovator S&P Investment Grade Preferred ETF vs Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- PFIG costs 0.25% less per year.
- EPRF is classified as alternative, while PFIG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- EPRF follows a structured outcome strategy; PFIG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, PFIG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PFIG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPRF | PFIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $72M | $113M |
| Since | 2016 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 6.08% | 4.37% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.0% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.0% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.5% | +1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.09 | 0.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.59% | 3.09% |
| Max drawdown | -26.82% | -15.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EPRF and PFIG
Explore further