Screener
POWR vs BILT
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Infrastructure Active ETF
Key differences
- POWR follows a index tracking strategy; BILT uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| POWR | BILT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $26M |
| Since | — | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.55 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.48% | — |
| Max drawdown | -63.42% | -5.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to POWR and BILT
Explore further