Screener
PPEM vs PEMX
Putnam Panagora ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF - vs Putnam Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- PPEM costs 0.09% less per year.
- PPEM follows a index tracking strategy; PEMX uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| PPEM | PEMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $20M |
| Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.93% | 1.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +53.9% | +62.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.68% | 21.02% |
| Max drawdown | -18.44% | -14.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PPEM and PEMX
Explore further