Screener
PPH vs GPZ
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF vs VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF
Key differences
- PPH is significantly larger than GPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PPH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PPH | GPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $966M | $245M |
| Since | 2011 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.12% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.07% | — |
| Max drawdown | -29.70% | -31.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PPH and GPZ
Explore further