Screener
PPI vs AMAX
Astoria Real Asset ETF vs Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
Key differences
- PPI costs 0.78% less per year.
- PPI follows a active selection strategy; AMAX uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, PPI has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PPI | AMAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 1.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $159M | $60M |
| Since | 2021 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.00% | 10.63% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.7% | +12.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 0.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.78% | 10.01% |
| Max drawdown | -24.54% | -16.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PPI and AMAX
Explore further