Screener
PPI vs RULE
Astoria Real Asset ETF vs Adaptive Core ETF
Key differences
- PPI costs 1.26% less per year.
- PPI is significantly larger than RULE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PPI is classified as alternative, while RULE is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, PPI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PPI | RULE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 1.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $159M | $14M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.7% | +47.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.78% | 20.08% |
| Max drawdown | -24.54% | -30.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PPI and RULE
Explore further