Screener
PSCF vs GRPZ
Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF vs Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF
Key differences
- PSCF costs 0.06% less per year.
- PSCF is significantly larger than GRPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PSCF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSCF | GRPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $3M |
| Since | 2010 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.34% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.6% | +25.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.56% | 17.82% |
| Max drawdown | -45.46% | -27.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSCF and GRPZ
Explore further