Screener
PSCM vs RWL
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
Key differences
- PSCM costs 0.10% less per year.
- RWL is significantly larger than PSCM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSCM | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21M | $8.8B |
| Since | 2010 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.01% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +66.3% | +29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | +20.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.9% | +13.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.10% | 10.12% |
| Max drawdown | -51.34% | -36.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSCM and RWL
Explore further