Screener
PSCU vs PHO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF vs Invesco Water Resources ETF
Key differences
- PSCU costs 0.30% less per year.
- PHO is significantly larger than PSCU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PHO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSCU | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2010 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 0.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.3% | -1.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.3% | +7.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.1% | +5.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.34 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.86% | 15.23% |
| Max drawdown | -29.97% | -34.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSCU and PHO
Explore further