Screener
PSCU vs CGW
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF vs Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF
Key differences
- PSCU costs 0.29% less per year.
- CGW is significantly larger than PSCU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, CGW has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSCU | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16M | $1.0B |
| Since | 2010 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 1.53% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.3% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.3% | +10.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.1% | +5.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.34 | 0.49 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.86% | 13.38% |
| Max drawdown | -29.97% | -35.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSCU and CGW
Explore further