Screener
PVI vs PGF
Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF vs Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PVI costs 0.30% less per year.
- PGF is significantly larger than PVI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PVI is classified as fixed income, while PGF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, PGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PVI | PGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $719M |
| Since | 2007 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 2.16% | 6.24% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.3% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.7% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.9% | -0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.34 | 0.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.61% | 6.36% |
| Max drawdown | -1.16% | -28.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PVI and PGF
Explore further