Screener
VRIG vs BAB
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF vs Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF
Key differences
- VRIG follows a active selection strategy; BAB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, VRIG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BAB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VRIG | BAB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $1.0B |
| Since | 2016 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 4.86% | 4.05% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.1% | +7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.1% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.4% | -0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.90 | 0.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.50% | 5.97% |
| Max drawdown | -13.04% | -27.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VRIG and BAB
Explore further