Screener
PXJ vs RWL
Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
Key differences
- RWL costs 0.24% less per year.
- RWL is significantly larger than PXJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PXJ | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.63% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $137M | $8.8B |
| Since | 2005 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.06% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +95.1% | +29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.6% | +20.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.6% | +13.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.41% | 10.12% |
| Max drawdown | -87.71% | -36.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PXJ and RWL
Explore further