Screener
PXJ vs RWK
Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
Key differences
- RWK costs 0.24% less per year.
- RWK is significantly larger than PXJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PXJ | RWK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.63% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $137M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2005 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.06% | 1.16% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +95.1% | +28.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.6% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.6% | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.41% | 16.91% |
| Max drawdown | -87.71% | -46.20% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PXJ and RWK
Explore further