Screener
PY vs FNDA
Principal Value ETF vs Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF
Key differences
- PY costs 0.10% less per year.
- FNDA is significantly larger than PY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PY follows a active selection strategy; FNDA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FNDA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PY | FNDA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $212M | $10.2B |
| Since | 2016 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 2.15% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.0% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | +16.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.74% | 17.24% |
| Max drawdown | -45.44% | -44.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PY and FNDA
Explore further