Screener
QAI vs MAPP
NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF vs Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF
Key differences
- MAPP costs 0.08% less per year.
- QAI is significantly larger than MAPP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QAI is classified as alternative, while MAPP is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- QAI follows a multi strategy strategy; MAPP uses active selection.
- QAI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QAI | MAPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $968M | $11M |
| Since | 2009 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | 2.83% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.3% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.97% | 8.97% |
| Max drawdown | -14.95% | -12.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QAI and MAPP
Explore further