Screener
QAI vs HFND
NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF vs Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF
Key differences
- QAI costs 0.19% less per year.
- QAI is significantly larger than HFND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QAI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QAI | HFND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 1.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $968M | $32M |
| Since | 2009 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | 4.72% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.3% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.9% | +9.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.97% | 9.44% |
| Max drawdown | -14.95% | -13.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QAI and HFND
Explore further