Screener
QDTE vs IGF
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF vs iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IGF costs 0.57% less per year.
- IGF is significantly larger than QDTE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QDTE is classified as alternative, while IGF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QDTE covers north america markets; IGF covers global.
- QDTE follows a option income strategy; IGF uses index tracking.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QDTE | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.96% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $828M | $10.7B |
| Since | 2024 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 45.82% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.8% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.95% | 10.40% |
| Max drawdown | -22.86% | -42.11% |
Similar to QDTE and IGF
Explore further