Screener
QDTE vs IFRA
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF vs iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IFRA costs 0.66% less per year.
- IFRA is significantly larger than QDTE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QDTE is classified as alternative, while IFRA is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QDTE follows a option income strategy; IFRA uses index tracking.
- IFRA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QDTE | IFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.96% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $828M | $4.1B |
| Since | 2024 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 45.82% | 1.56% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.8% | +33.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.95% | 14.82% |
| Max drawdown | -22.86% | -41.06% |
Similar to QDTE and IFRA
Explore further