Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

QDTE vs RKSG

Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF vs Ruk Strategic Growth ETF

QDTE

Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF

Roundhill Investments

Annual cost

0.96%

Fund size

$828M

RKSG

Ruk Strategic Growth ETF

Ruk Funds

Annual cost

0.50%

Fund size

$1M

Key differences

  • RKSG costs 0.46% less per year.
  • QDTE is significantly larger than RKSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • QDTE is classified as alternative, while RKSG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • QDTE follows a option income strategy; RKSG uses index tracking.

Side-by-side comparison

QDTERKSG
Annual cost (TER)0.96%0.50%
Fund size (AUM)$828M$1M
Since20242026
Dividend yield45.82%
Asset classalternativeequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyoption incomeindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+39.9%N/A
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y14.90%
Max drawdown-22.86%-1.85%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to QDTE and RKSG