Screener
QFHD vs CGDV
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF vs Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
Key differences
- CGDV costs 0.16% less per year.
- CGDV is significantly larger than QFHD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QFHD follows a index tracking strategy; CGDV uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| QFHD | CGDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $0.5M | $33.0B |
| Since | 2026 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +33.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +25.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.49 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 11.75% |
| Max drawdown | -5.52% | -21.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QFHD and CGDV
Explore further