Screener
QFHD vs CGIC
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF vs Capital Group International Core Equity ETF
Key differences
- QFHD costs 0.05% less per year.
- CGIC is significantly larger than QFHD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QFHD follows a index tracking strategy; CGIC uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| QFHD | CGIC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $0.5M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2026 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +30.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.96% |
| Max drawdown | -5.52% | -13.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QFHD and CGIC
Explore further